The moon on a stick

Standard

It’s official. My eldest daughter looked longingly at the moon on her way back from the hairdresser’s this evening, and expressed her desire to ‘give it a cuddle’.

Which leaves me just over two weeks to find some plausible lunar-alternative, or we’re going to have a very disgruntled five-year-old on our hands this Christmas.

Meanwhile, her sister has comparatively parochial designs on a road-sweeping vehicle (the giant vacuum hose attachment receiving particular acclaim).

Whilst it seems unlikely that either of the younger Gileses will be receiving their present of first choice, we have been keen to encourage the current fascination for hoovering. We have offered many, many opportunities to ensure vacuuming fulfillment.

We are hoping the domestic prowess may, in time, spread to washing, ironing, light garden maintenance and the like. That would make a wonderful Christmas present.

Mad about Madiba?

Standard

On Thursday (5 December), a massive storm surge was wreaking havoc along large parts of the east coast of the UK. Sea defences were breached, houses and livelihoods flooded, thousands of people evacuated. Unsurprisingly, the country’s news media were feverish, as they reported too on the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement. Until just after 9:45pm, that is.

For that is when, in a broadcast that spanned the globe, South African president Jacob Zuma announced to the world that Nelson Mandela had died. Suddenly it was as if nothing else mattered.

The passing away of any other 95 year old may have gone unreported, unnoticed to all but his closest family. But this was no ordinary man.

I remember watching similarly wall-to-wall news coverage when Mandela was released from prison in 1990. That he went on to be South Africa’s first black president represented an incredible social and political change, and the downfall of the abhorrent and inherently unjust system of apartheid.

But Mandela was not a universally loved figure. Biographer Anthony Sampson refers to the mythology that surrounded him, turning him ‘a secular saint’ and which was ‘so powerful that it blurs the realities’. Certainly, many of the tributes from commentators over the last few days have been almost too glowing. Mark Steel has blogged about this eloquently, wondering if it was ‘like this 2000 years ago when Jesus died’.

Something about this pseudo-veneration grates. As it did when Margaret Thatcher died (and DJ wags were banned from playing certain Wizard of Oz numbers). As it did when Diana, Princess of Wales, left this mortal coil.

Freud (another more erudite mind than mine) puts it thus: ‘We assume a special attitude towards the dead, something almost like admiration for one who has accomplished a very difficult feat. We suspend criticism of him, overlooking whatever wrongs he may have done.’

Why do we feel the need to sanitise or polish up a recently-deceased person’s CV? Is it simply respect? Or is it actually because we don’t like talking about death very much, and need something ‘nice’ to paper over the cracks? Can it be socially acceptable to strike a balance?

Madiba – for all his faults – achieved great things, changed a good number of lives for the better and, crucially, argued cogently and authentically for forgiveness. And that’s something we all need.

Dad-vent

Standard

‘Tis the season to be running around like a mad thing.

The manifold wonders of nursery/school/church nativity plays are nearly upon us, and with it comes a social diary that hasn’t been quite so full since I was five. Christmas fairs, parties, dads and kids cooking morning, dress rehearsals for our fledgling angels (oh, the irony).

All of this is superimposed upon a weekly schedule that already includes school runs, phonics practice, meal preparation, and all the 1001 other things that looking after two small children involves. Oh, and the day job (which is itself massively busy in the run-up to Christmas, with a webcast link-up between three countries to get ready for). And extra bits like stepping into the musical breach at church for Sunday evening’s service.

Undoubtedly mums get it worse (and grandmothers – to whom unceasing thanks are due for working wonders with distinctly substandard seraphimic apparel). But I am cream-crackered already, and we’re still three weeks off the Big Day.

The prospect of a couple of weeks off work is most appealing. Except it doesn’t really work like that any more. Gone are the days of long lie-ins, back-to-back 24 and methodically working through a biblical expanse of chocolate. Instead, it’s a case of being leapt upon at an indecent hour of the morning by two small pirates/princesses/bees, back-to-back CBeebies and wondering who to blame for the ludicrous invention of Advent calendars that introduce chocolate (and, ergo, sugar) into the children’s diet before breakfast.

How does one simplify life in the run-up to Christmas, relax and find time to actually focus on the things that are really important? I do not yet have a solution. Or at least not one that doesn’t involve wrapping the girls up instead of the presents…

 

‘I’m back’ (to Bitcoin a phrase)

Standard

I’m back!

And over the coming weeks, I’ll be sharing some of the joys and horrors of being me. Insights from the world of the web and social media (that sounds posh), perplexed musings about the latest exemplum of ‘customer service’ to get my goat, ruminations about Christianity, the occasional travelogue (when not stuck on South West Trains near Bentley), and anything else that needs to be dislodged from my brain and happens to fall this way.

So, to get the show back on the road. Here’s a thing: Bitcoin.

As you may have read elsewhere, there may (or may not) be £4 million of buried treasure on a landfill site in South Wales. Ahoy, me hearties, etc.

Even before this revelation, my mind was being mildly exercised by the issue of whether it is ethical for a charity to receive donations in Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is ‘a consensus network that enables a new payment system and a completely digital money. It is the first decentralized peer-to-peer payment network that is powered by its users with no central authority or middlemen.’ Still confused? OK, Bitcoin is ‘pretty much like cash for the Internet’ (source: bitcoin.org).

Being a responsible sort of chap, I consulted. One of my colleagues responded with ‘What’s Bitcoin?’. Not an unreasonable question, though I may have been somewhat harsh with my taunts of poverty in response. (According to currency exchange website xe.com, a Bitcoin is currently worth over £600. Though as it’s not legal tender in any country, the value is somewhat moot anyway.)

My other colleague responded even more negatively, pointing out – quite correctly – that Bitcoin is believed to be the currency of choice for transactions that organisations might not especially want to be fully audited. Arms, drugs, people… that kind of thing.

But can a currency – or pseudo-currency – be intrinsically ‘bad’? Should we eschew sterling, dollars and yen because illicit buying and selling has been going on in those currencies since time immemorial? Given that my musings were taking place at the same time as the boss of Co-operative Bank (‘the ethical bank’, no less) was being outed for all manner of inappropriate behaviour, I’d argue that the behaviours of individual users of any financial system cannot transmogrify some kind of morality on to that system itself.

Bitcoin is in the ascendancy. Whether its surge of popularity continues is a question taxing greater economic minds than mine. But if a supporter wishes to give a Bitcoin donation to charity, would it be prudent to accept it? What do you think?